linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] irqchip: sun4i: fix compilation outside of arch/arm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 17:50:19 +0100
From:	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Cc:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] irqchip: sun4i: fix compilation outside of arch/arm



On 02/02/16 16:32, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/02/16 15:12, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>> On 01/02/16 18:39, Andre Przywara wrote:
>>> The Allwinner sunxi specific interrupt controller cannot be compiled
>>> for any architecture except arm:
>>
>> s/arm/arm64
>
> ???
>
> As it stands it only compiles for arm, and not arm64, so "cannot be
> compile for any architecture except arm" is the right thing to say, no?
>
> Or did I get confused by my own double negation?
>

No, it's just me who get confused. ;)
Sorry for the noise.