lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 09:02:16 -0800 From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Wei Tang <tangwei@...s.chinamobile.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org, kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, jason.low2@...com, xypron.glpk@....de, oleg@...hat.com, koct9i@...il.com, josh@...htriplett.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com, cyphar@...har.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 15:45 +0000, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:11:18AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Wei Tang <tangwei@...s.chinamobile.com> wrote: [] > > > WARNING: sizeof sig->rlim should be sizeof(sig->rlim) [] > > If anyone feels strongly about accepting such patches, then the right solution isĀ > > to create a Coccinelle semantic patch to run over the whole kernel and get overĀ > > with the churn once and for all. > > That, or a single patch taking that piece of idiocy out of checkpatch.pl... https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/11/103
Powered by blists - more mailing lists