[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 18:23:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...tec.com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock()
On 2 February 2016 07:44:33 CET, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> If so, do we also need to take the following pairing into
>consideration?
>>
>> o smp_store_release() -> READ_ONCE(); if ;smp_rmb(); <ACCESS_ONCE()>
We rely on this with smp_cond_aquire() to extend the chain.
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists