linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] Watchdog: ARM SBSA Generic Watchdog half timeout panic support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:53:29 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>
To:	Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jon Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
	rruigrok@...eaurora.org, "Abdulhamid, Harb" <harba@...eaurora.org>,
	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Pratyush Anand <panand@...hat.com>,
	G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>, sudeep.holla@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] Watchdog: ARM SBSA Generic Watchdog half timeout
 panic support

Fu Wei wrote:
> sorry, are you saying : using pre-timeout instead of this half timeout?
>
> But even we have pre-timeout support, pre-timeout  == timeout / 2, it
> can not be configured without touch timeout.
>
> if you want pre-timeout  != timeout / 2, we have to modify WCV in the
> interrupt routine.
>   (because of the explicit watchdog refresh  mechanism)
>
> Could you let me know why we need pre-timeout  here ??:-)

What I meant was that if we had full-blown pre-timeout support in the 
watchdog layer, then you could use that to implement the 
panic-on-half-timeout feature.

When pre-timeout is implemented, will you modify the interrupt handler 
to use it?

>> >belong upstream.  But like I said, it's just my opinion, and I won't
>> >complain if I'm outvoted.
>   I think this debugging feature is the  purpose of the two-stage
> watchdog, if I understand correctly

Hmmm... that make sense.  I think maybe you should drop the Kconfig 
option, and just have "static bool panic_enabled = false;"  Also, then 
do this:

if (panic_enabled) {
	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, sbsa_gwdt_interrupt, 0,
			       pdev->name, gwdt);
	if (ret) {
		dev_err(dev, "unable to request IRQ %d\n", irq);
		return ret;
	}
}

That way, the interrupt handler is never registered if the command-line 
parameter is not specified.