linux-kernel - Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160203191513.GN14091@mtj.duckdns.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:15:13 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@...system.cz>
Subject: Re: Crashes with 874bbfe600a6 in 3.18.25

On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:05:57PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Well, you're in an unnecessary escalation mode as usual.  Was the
> > attitude really necessary?  Chill out and read the thread again.
> > Michal is saying the dwork->cpu assignment was bogus and I was
> > refuting that.
>
> Right, but at the same time you could have admitted, that the current state is
> buggy and needs a sanity check in unbound_pwq_by_node().

It's crashing.  Of course it's buggy.  The main discussion on the bug
was on the other thread and I was trying to put out the confusions
posted on this thread.

> > Michal brought it up here but there's a different thread where Mike
> > reported NUMA_NO_NODE issue and I already posted the fix.
> > 
> >  http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160203185425.GK14091@mtj.duckdns.org
> 
> 5 minute ago w/o cc'ing the people who participated in that discussion.

Yeah, I got to the thread this morning and got your email right after
sending out the patch.  I don't know.  The handling of this wasn't out
of the norm.  I asked this multiple times but let me try again.  Can
we please try to stay civil and technical?  There are times where
escalation is necessary but this one was gratuitous.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun