[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B25FB4.10404@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 12:14:44 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
dietmar.eggemann@....com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: governor: Create separate sysfs-ops
On 02/02/2016 10:54 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 02-02-16, 17:32, Saravana Kannan wrote:
>> But if we are expecting sched dvfs to come in, why make it worse for it. It
>> would be completely pointless to try and shoehorn sched dvfs to use
>> cpufreq_governor.c
>
> We can move the common part to cpufreq core and not make sched-dvfs
> reuse cpufreq_governor.c
>
Let's do this please.
-Saravana
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists