linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] USB changes for rare warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1964102.4NLQkU883F@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2016 21:49:22 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] USB changes for rare warnings

On Wednesday 03 February 2016 20:15:47 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> > Hi Arnd,
> >
> >>  arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/ixp4xx-regs.h | 198 ---------
> >>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h     | 163 --------
> >
> > for arch/arm I need Acked-by from relevant folks.
> You already have mine for arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/pxa25x-udc.h I think,
> or did my mailer betray me again ...

I saw it.

> I cannot speak for ixp4xx though.

Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl> gave an Ack for the first patch already,
and I think we concluded that the patch was keeping the current behavior
otherwise and is therefore not a regression, though we did not finish
the side-discussion about whether ixp4xx actually works in both BE and LE
mode with both indirect and direct I/O, or which of the four combinations
is broken.

> > Also, do you think we need this during the -rc or can we consider it
> > non-critical fixes for v4.6 merge window ?

I meant it for 4.6, sorry for not being very clear about that.
All the warnings I fixed in this series are harmless as far as I
can tell, and they only show up in rare randconfig builds.

	Arnd