linux-kernel - Re: IRe: [PATCH] vsprintf: flowinfo in IPv6 is optional too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHmME9qg8e_Uh2ugPwwsPbWzax8BU1H1hSpQWgFJGy+Wsc3EGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:15:57 +0100
From:	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux@...musvillemoes.dk, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dborkman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: IRe: [PATCH] vsprintf: flowinfo in IPv6 is optional too

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> wrote:
> Another possibility also in regards to your other patch would be to have
> a different format string char option instead of 'f'/'s' that would then
> allow a developer for having both options to choose from. Dunno if it's
> really worth it, but if you have a use case that definitely needs it, then
> it'd be probably better. Less surprises during debugging, at least.

Just came to this too over in the other patch thread. I'll cook this up now.