[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A88C6B7F-2E21-4AF9-ABDE-85B91F5F516C@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:18:03 -0800
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Bruce Rogers <brogers@...e.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: fix ordering of cr0 initialization code in vmx_cpu_reset
Oops.
Anyhow, I see my patch has done a similar change in init_vmcb() , so you may
want to revert it as well.
Nadav
Bruce Rogers <brogers@...e.com> wrote:
> Commit d28bc9dd25ce reversed the order of two lines which initialize cr0,
> allowing the current (old) cr0 value to mess up vcpu initialization.
> This was observed in the checks for cr0 X86_CR0_WP bit in the context of
> kvm_mmu_reset_context(). Besides, setting vcpu->arch.cr0 after vmx_set_cr0()
> is completely redundant. Change the order back to ensure proper vcpu
> intiialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Rogers <brogers@...e.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index e2951b6..21507b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -4993,8 +4993,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> vmcs_write16(VIRTUAL_PROCESSOR_ID, vmx->vpid);
>
> cr0 = X86_CR0_NW | X86_CR0_CD | X86_CR0_ET;
> - vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, cr0); /* enter rmode */
> vmx->vcpu.arch.cr0 = cr0;
> + vmx_set_cr0(vcpu, cr0); /* enter rmode */
> vmx_set_cr4(vcpu, 0);
> vmx_set_efer(vcpu, 0);
> vmx_fpu_activate(vcpu);
> --
> 1.9.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists