[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1454538786-12215-105-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:31:50 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: "Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 104/180] sparc64: fix incorrect sign extension in sys_sparc64_personality
3.16.7-ckt24 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
commit 525fd5a94e1be0776fa652df5c687697db508c91 upstream.
The value returned by sys_personality has type "long int".
It is saved to a variable of type "int", which is not a problem
yet because the type of task_struct->pesonality is "unsigned int".
The problem is the sign extension from "int" to "long int"
that happens on return from sys_sparc64_personality.
For example, a userspace call personality((unsigned) -EINVAL) will
result to any subsequent personality call, including absolutely
harmless read-only personality(0xffffffff) call, failing with
errno set to EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
index 30e7ddb27a3a..c690c8e16a96 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sys_sparc_64.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ out:
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(sparc64_personality, unsigned long, personality)
{
- int ret;
+ long ret;
if (personality(current->personality) == PER_LINUX32 &&
personality(personality) == PER_LINUX)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists