[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B17872.2050908@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 00:48:02 -0300
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com
Cc: cw00.choi@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap, irq
chip locally
Hello Laxman,
I'll comment on top of Krzysztof's answer since I agree with his remarks.
On 02/02/2016 10:17 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02.02.2016 22:16, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> To make RTC block of MAX77686/MAX77802 as independent driver,
>> move the registeration of i2c device, regmap for register access
>
> s/registeration/registration/
>
>> and irq_chip for interrupt support inside the RTC driver.
>> Removed the same initialisation from mfd driver.
>
> s/mfd/MFD/
>
> I would expect here also information answering to the "why" question.
> Why are you doing all of this? Why we want RTC driver to be independent?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
>> CC: Krzysztof Mazur <krzysiek@...lesie.net>
I guess you meant Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> here?
Unless I missed some previous discussion and Krzysztof Mazur was involved?
>> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 82 +------------
>> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 7 +-
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h | 16 ---
>> 4 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
>> index d959ebb..8254201 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max77686.c
>> @@ -116,11 +116,6 @@ static const struct regmap_config max77686_regmap_config = {
>> .val_bits = 8,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
>> - .reg_bits = 8,
>> - .val_bits = 8,
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct regmap_config max77802_regmap_config = {
>> .reg_bits = 8,
>> .val_bits = 8,
>> @@ -156,25 +151,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_irq_chip = {
>> .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
>> - /* RTC interrupts */
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
>> - { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
>> -};
>> -
>> -static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
>> - .name = "max77686-rtc",
>> - .status_base = MAX77686_RTC_INT,
>> - .mask_base = MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
>> - .num_regs = 1,
>> - .irqs = max77686_rtc_irqs,
>> - .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
>> .name = "max77802-pmic",
>> .status_base = MAX77802_REG_INT1,
>> @@ -184,15 +160,6 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_irq_chip = {
>> .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_irqs),
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
>> - .name = "max77802-rtc",
>> - .status_base = MAX77802_RTC_INT,
>> - .mask_base = MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
>> - .num_regs = 1,
>> - .irqs = max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
>> - .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct of_device_id max77686_pmic_dt_match[] = {
>> {
>> .compatible = "maxim,max77686",
>> @@ -214,8 +181,6 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> int ret = 0;
>> const struct regmap_config *config;
>> const struct regmap_irq_chip *irq_chip;
>> - const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
>> - struct regmap **rtc_regmap;
>> const struct mfd_cell *cells;
>> int n_devs;
>>
>> @@ -242,15 +207,11 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
>> config = &max77686_regmap_config;
>> irq_chip = &max77686_irq_chip;
>> - rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip;
>> - rtc_regmap = &max77686->rtc_regmap;
>> cells = max77686_devs;
>> n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_devs);
>> } else {
>> config = &max77802_regmap_config;
>> irq_chip = &max77802_irq_chip;
>> - rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip;
>> - rtc_regmap = &max77686->regmap;
>> cells = max77802_devs;
>> n_devs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77802_devs);
>> }
>> @@ -270,60 +231,25 @@ static int max77686_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>> return -ENODEV;
>> }
>>
>> - if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686) {
>> - max77686->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(i2c->adapter, I2C_ADDR_RTC);
>> - if (!max77686->rtc) {
>> - dev_err(max77686->dev,
>> - "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
>> - return -ENODEV;
>> - }
>> - i2c_set_clientdata(max77686->rtc, max77686);
>> -
>> - max77686->rtc_regmap =
>> - devm_regmap_init_i2c(max77686->rtc,
>> - &max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
>> - if (IS_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(max77686->rtc_regmap);
>> - dev_err(max77686->dev,
>> - "failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n",
>> - ret);
>> - goto err_unregister_i2c;
>> - }
>> - }
>> -
>> ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(max77686->regmap, max77686->irq,
>> IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
>> IRQF_SHARED, 0, irq_chip,
>> &max77686->irq_data);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add PMIC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err_unregister_i2c;
>> - }
>> -
>> - ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(*rtc_regmap, max77686->irq,
>> - IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
>> - IRQF_SHARED, 0, rtc_irq_chip,
>> - &max77686->rtc_irq_data);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err_del_irqc;
>> + return -ENODEV;
>
> return ret;
>
>> }
>>
>> ret = mfd_add_devices(max77686->dev, -1, cells, n_devs, NULL, 0, NULL);
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add MFD devices: %d\n", ret);
>> - goto err_del_rtc_irqc;
>> + goto err_del_irqc;
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> -err_del_rtc_irqc:
>> - regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
>> err_del_irqc:
>> regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
>> -err_unregister_i2c:
>> - if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
>> - i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> @@ -334,12 +260,8 @@ static int max77686_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *i2c)
>>
>> mfd_remove_devices(max77686->dev);
>>
>> - regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->rtc_irq_data);
>> regmap_del_irq_chip(max77686->irq, max77686->irq_data);
>>
>> - if (max77686->type == TYPE_MAX77686)
>> - i2c_unregister_device(max77686->rtc);
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>> index ec6a253..bdac624 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
>> @@ -325,14 +325,13 @@ config RTC_DRV_MAX8997
>> will be called rtc-max8997.
>>
>> config RTC_DRV_MAX77686
>> - tristate "Maxim MAX77686"
>> - depends on MFD_MAX77686
>
> It still depends on some parent. Instantiating this without main MFD
> probably would cause errors around max77686_init_rtc_regmap().
>
Indeed, if the RTC device can be registered by different MFD drivers,
then the driver should depend on X || Y
>> + tristate "Maxim MAX77686/MAX77802"
>> help
>> If you say yes here you will get support for the
>> - RTC of Maxim MAX77686 PMIC.
>> + RTC of Maxim MAX77686/MAX77802 PMIC.
>>
>> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>> - will be called rtc-max77686.
>> + will be called rtc-max77686/MAX77802.
>
> The name of module does not change.
>
>>
>> config RTC_DRV_RK808
>> tristate "Rockchip RK808 RTC"
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
>> index ab1f2cd..21a88e2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c
>> @@ -12,16 +12,100 @@
>> *
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/rtc.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> -#include <linux/mfd/max77686-private.h>
>
> I think the include should remain. No need of duplicating here the
> register addresses. Although we wnat the driver to be independent from
> parent it is still coming from one parent or another.
>
>> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> #include <linux/regmap.h>
>>
>> +#define MAX77686_REG_STATUS2 0x07
>> +
>> +enum max77686_rtc_reg {
>> + MAX77686_RTC_INT = 0x00,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_INTM = 0x01,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_CONTROLM = 0x02,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_CONTROL = 0x03,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_UPDATE0 = 0x04,
>> + /* Reserved: 0x5 */
>> + MAX77686_WTSR_SMPL_CNTL = 0x06,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_SEC = 0x07,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_MIN = 0x08,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_HOUR = 0x09,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_WEEKDAY = 0x0A,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_MONTH = 0x0B,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_YEAR = 0x0C,
>> + MAX77686_RTC_DATE = 0x0D,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_SEC = 0x0E,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_MIN = 0x0F,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_HOUR = 0x10,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_WEEKDAY = 0x11,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_MONTH = 0x12,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_YEAR = 0x13,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM1_DATE = 0x14,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_SEC = 0x15,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_MIN = 0x16,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_HOUR = 0x17,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_WEEKDAY = 0x18,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_MONTH = 0x19,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_YEAR = 0x1A,
>> + MAX77686_ALARM2_DATE = 0x1B,
>> +};
>> +
>> +enum max77802_rtc_reg {
>> + MAX77802_RTC_INT = 0xC0,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_INTM = 0xC1,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_CONTROLM = 0xC2,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_CONTROL = 0xC3,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_UPDATE0 = 0xC4,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_UPDATE1 = 0xC5,
>> + MAX77802_WTSR_SMPL_CNTL = 0xC6,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_SEC = 0xC7,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_MIN = 0xC8,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_HOUR = 0xC9,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_WEEKDAY = 0xCA,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_MONTH = 0xCB,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_YEAR = 0xCC,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_DATE = 0xCD,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_AE1 = 0xCE,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_SEC = 0xCF,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_MIN = 0xD0,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_HOUR = 0xD1,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_WEEKDAY = 0xD2,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_MONTH = 0xD3,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_YEAR = 0xD4,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM1_DATE = 0xD5,
>> + MAX77802_RTC_AE2 = 0xD6,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_SEC = 0xD7,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_MIN = 0xD8,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_HOUR = 0xD9,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_WEEKDAY = 0xDA,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_MONTH = 0xDB,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_YEAR = 0xDC,
>> + MAX77802_ALARM2_DATE = 0xDD,
>> +
>> + MAX77802_RTC_END = 0xDF,
>> +};
>
> All of these should come from existing max77686/max77802/max77620 headers.
>
>> +
>> +enum max77686_rtc_irq {
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTC60S = 0,
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1,
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA2,
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_SMPL,
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTC1S,
>> + MAX77686_RTCIRQ_WTSR,
>> +};
>
> ditto
>
>> +
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK BIT(0)
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK BIT(1)
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK BIT(2)
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK BIT(3)
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK BIT(4)
>> +#define MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK BIT(5)
>
> ditto
>
>> +
>> /* RTC Control Register */
>> #define BCD_EN_SHIFT 0
>> #define BCD_EN_MASK BIT(BCD_EN_SHIFT)
>> @@ -68,8 +152,10 @@ struct max77686_rtc_driver_data {
>> const unsigned int *map;
>> /* Has a separate alarm enable register? */
>> bool alarm_enable_reg;
>> - /* Has a separate I2C regmap for the RTC? */
>> - bool separate_i2c_addr;
>> + /* I2C address for RTC block */
>> + u8 separate_i2c_addr;
The separate_i2c_addr field name made sense for a bool since it was
answering a question but now that is a u8, I believe that should be
called rtc_i2c_addr or something like that instead.
>> + /* RTC IRQ CHIP for regmap */
>> + const struct regmap_irq_chip *rtc_irq_chip;
>> };
>>
>> struct max77686_rtc_info {
>> @@ -82,7 +168,9 @@ struct max77686_rtc_info {
>> struct regmap *rtc_regmap;
>>
>> const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *drv_data;
>> + struct regmap_irq_chip_data *rtc_irq_data;
>>
>> + int rtc_irq;
>> int virq;
>> int rtc_24hr_mode;
>> };
>> @@ -153,12 +241,32 @@ static const unsigned int max77686_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
>> [REG_RTC_AE1] = REG_RTC_NONE,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct regmap_irq max77686_rtc_irqs[] = {
>> + /* RTC interrupts */
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC60S_MSK, },
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA1_MSK, },
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTCA2_MSK, },
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_SMPL_MSK, },
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_RTC1S_MSK, },
>> + { .reg_offset = 0, .mask = MAX77686_RTCINT_WTSR_MSK, },
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77686_rtc_irq_chip = {
>> + .name = "max77686-rtc",
>> + .status_base = MAX77686_RTC_INT,
>> + .mask_base = MAX77686_RTC_INTM,
>> + .num_regs = 1,
>> + .irqs = max77686_rtc_irqs,
>> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77686_drv_data = {
>> .delay = 16000,
>> .mask = 0x7f,
>> .map = max77686_map,
>> .alarm_enable_reg = false,
>> - .separate_i2c_addr = true,
>> + .separate_i2c_addr = 0xC >> 1,
>
> When the header will remain:
> I2C_ADDR_RTC
> (maybe it needs some prefix?)
>
>> + .rtc_irq_chip = &max77686_rtc_irq_chip,
>> };
>>
>> static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
>> @@ -190,12 +298,22 @@ static const unsigned int max77802_map[REG_RTC_END] = {
>> [REG_RTC_AE1] = MAX77802_RTC_AE1,
>> };
>>
>> +static const struct regmap_irq_chip max77802_rtc_irq_chip = {
>> + .name = "max77802-rtc",
>> + .status_base = MAX77802_RTC_INT,
>> + .mask_base = MAX77802_RTC_INTM,
>> + .num_regs = 1,
>> + .irqs = max77686_rtc_irqs, /* same masks as 77686 */
>> + .num_irqs = ARRAY_SIZE(max77686_rtc_irqs),
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data max77802_drv_data = {
>> .delay = 200,
>> .mask = 0xff,
>> .map = max77802_map,
>> .alarm_enable_reg = true,
>> - .separate_i2c_addr = false,
>> + .separate_i2c_addr = 0,
AFAIK 0 is a reserved address for I2C (general call address) so maybe
it would be better to use an invalid address to specify that the RTC
doesn't have a separate I2C address for the registers and check this?
>> + .rtc_irq_chip = &max77802_rtc_irq_chip,
>> };
>>
>> static void max77686_rtc_data_to_tm(u8 *data, struct rtc_time *tm,
>> @@ -599,9 +717,65 @@ static int max77686_rtc_init_reg(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct regmap_config max77686_rtc_regmap_config = {
>> + .reg_bits = 8,
>> + .val_bits = 8,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int max77686_init_rtc_regmap(struct max77686_rtc_info *info)
>> +{
>> + struct device *parent = info->dev->parent;
>> + struct i2c_client *parent_i2c = to_i2c_client(parent);
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + info->rtc_irq = parent_i2c->irq;
>
> Double space.
>
>> +
>> + info->regmap = dev_get_regmap(parent, NULL);
>> + if (!info->regmap) {
>> + dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to get rtc regmap\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) {
>> + info->rtc = parent_i2c;
>
> I think it should remain NULL in such case. You won't be using it
> anyway... but in case if you use it then it will be an error anyway
> (like in error path below).
>
>> + goto add_rtc_irq;
>> + }
>> +
>> + info->rtc = i2c_new_dummy(parent_i2c->adapter,
>> + info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr);
>
> Please align the argument on new line.
>
>> + if (!info->rtc) {
>> + dev_err(info->dev, "Failed to allocate I2C device for RTC\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> + i2c_set_clientdata(info->rtc, info);
>
> No need for this. There is no getter. Removal of this could be a
> separate patch (before this one).
>
>> +
>> + info->rtc_regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(info->rtc,
>> + &max77686_rtc_regmap_config);
>> + if (IS_ERR(info->rtc_regmap)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(info->rtc_regmap);
>> + dev_err(info->dev, "failed to allocate RTC regmap: %d\n", ret);
>
> While moving the messages can you unify the capital letter style (e.g.
> all of error msg starting with capital).
>
>> + goto err_unregister_i2c;
>> + }
>> +
>> +add_rtc_irq:
>> + ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(info->rtc_regmap, info->rtc_irq,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT |
>> + IRQF_SHARED, 0, info->drv_data->rtc_irq_chip,
>> + &info->rtc_irq_data);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(info->dev, "failed to add RTC irq chip: %d\n", ret);
>> + goto err_unregister_i2c;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_unregister_i2c:
>> + i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
>
> That would unregister the parent. You are missing "if (separate)".
>
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - struct max77686_dev *max77686 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
>> struct max77686_rtc_info *info;
>> const struct platform_device_id *id = platform_get_device_id(pdev);
>> int ret;
>> @@ -613,18 +787,16 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> mutex_init(&info->lock);
>> info->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> - info->rtc = max77686->rtc;
>> info->drv_data = (const struct max77686_rtc_driver_data *)
>> id->driver_data;
>>
>> - info->regmap = max77686->regmap;
>> - info->rtc_regmap = (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr) ?
>> - max77686->rtc_regmap : info->regmap;
>> + ret = max77686_init_rtc_regmap(info);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>>
>> ret = max77686_rtc_init_reg(info);
>> -
>> if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to initialize RTC reg:%d\n", ret);
>> goto err_rtc;
>> @@ -643,13 +815,7 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> goto err_rtc;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!max77686->rtc_irq_data) {
>> - ret = -EINVAL;
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No RTC regmap IRQ chip\n");
>> - goto err_rtc;
>> - }
>> -
>> - info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(max77686->rtc_irq_data,
>> + info->virq = regmap_irq_get_virq(info->rtc_irq_data,
>> MAX77686_RTCIRQ_RTCA1);
>> if (!info->virq) {
>> ret = -ENXIO;
>> @@ -659,14 +825,34 @@ static int max77686_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, info->virq, NULL,
>> max77686_rtc_alarm_irq, 0,
>> "rtc-alarm1", info);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request alarm IRQ: %d: %d\n",
>> info->virq, ret);
>> + goto err_rtc;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>>
>> err_rtc:
>> + if (info->drv_data->separate_i2c_addr)
>> + i2c_unregister_device(info->rtc);
>> + regmap_del_irq_chip(info->rtc_irq, info->rtc_irq_data);
>
> Cleanup in reverse-order of allocation. So first del irq_chip then
> unregister i2c.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists