linux-kernel - Re: [CRIU] x86: Hardware breakpoints are not always triggered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <D0C68AD3-0BF2-4F39-88AB-4BABCE92FDFF@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:32:46 -0800
From:	Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Vagin <avagin@...tuozzo.com>,
	Andrey Wagin <avagin@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"criu@...nvz.org" <criu@...nvz.org>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [CRIU] x86: Hardware breakpoints are not always triggered

Sorry for spamming. The correct fix appears to reload the DRs (set
KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD) in kvm_arch_vcpu_load .

(for me it works)

Regards,
Nadav

 

Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:

> I think the problem lies here:
> 
>        /*
>         * If the guest has used debug registers, at least dr7
>         * will be disabled while returning to the host.
>         * If we don't have active breakpoints in the host, we don't
>         * care about the messed up debug address registers. But if
>         * we have some of them active, restore the old state.
>         */
>        if (hw_breakpoint_active()) {
>                hw_breakpoint_restore();
>        }
> 
> First we need to reload the DRs after we do hw_breakpoint_restore(), no?
> 	vcpu->arch.switch_db_regs |= KVM_DEBUGREG_RELOAD;
> 
> Second, I am unsure whether hw_breakpoint_active() is the correct condition.
> 
> In my defense note that my tests did not his this case since I set affinity
> of the VCPUs to physical cores, and prevented other processes from running.
> 
> Regards,
> Nadav
> 
> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 29/01/2016 23:21, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:42:25PM -0800, Andrey Wagin wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:33:28PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>> On 28/01/2016 09:31, Andrey Wagin wrote:
>>>>>> I tried to print drX registers after a break-point. Looks like they
>>>>>> are set correctly.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you try this KVM patch?
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like it fixes a case when reproducers are running only in VM.
>>> 
>>> Actually Oleg's reproducer detects the bug with this patch when they are
>>> rinning only in VM.
>> 
>> That's actually a good thing, because the patch was a long shot and I
>> had no clue _why_ it would have fixed the bug.  Oleg's reproducer
>> spanning host and a VM actually gives me an idea of what is going on,
>> I'll try to reproduce this week.
>> 
>> Paolo
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html