[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1454538786-12215-42-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 22:30:47 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 041/180] powerpc: Make {cmp}xchg* and their atomic_ versions fully ordered
3.16.7-ckt24 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
commit 81d7a3294de7e9828310bbf986a67246b13fa01e upstream.
According to memory-barriers.txt, xchg*, cmpxchg* and their atomic_
versions all need to be fully ordered, however they are now just
RELEASE+ACQUIRE, which are not fully ordered.
So also replace PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER and PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER with
PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER and PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER in
__{cmp,}xchg_{u32,u64} respectively to guarantee fully ordered semantics
of atomic{,64}_{cmp,}xchg() and {cmp,}xchg(), as a complement of commit
b97021f85517 ("powerpc: Fix atomic_xxx_return barrier semantics")
This patch depends on patch "powerpc: Make value-returning atomics fully
ordered" for PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER definition.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
index d463c68fe7f0..99897f6645c1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h
@@ -18,12 +18,12 @@ __xchg_u32(volatile void *p, unsigned long val)
unsigned long prev;
__asm__ __volatile__(
- PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 \n"
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
" stwcx. %3,0,%2 \n\
bne- 1b"
- PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*(volatile unsigned int *)p)
: "r" (p), "r" (val)
: "cc", "memory");
@@ -61,12 +61,12 @@ __xchg_u64(volatile void *p, unsigned long val)
unsigned long prev;
__asm__ __volatile__(
- PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 \n"
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
" stdcx. %3,0,%2 \n\
bne- 1b"
- PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*(volatile unsigned long *)p)
: "r" (p), "r" (val)
: "cc", "memory");
@@ -152,14 +152,14 @@ __cmpxchg_u32(volatile unsigned int *p, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
unsigned int prev;
__asm__ __volatile__ (
- PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
"1: lwarx %0,0,%2 # __cmpxchg_u32\n\
cmpw 0,%0,%3\n\
bne- 2f\n"
PPC405_ERR77(0,%2)
" stwcx. %4,0,%2\n\
bne- 1b"
- PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
"\n\
2:"
: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*p)
@@ -198,13 +198,13 @@ __cmpxchg_u64(volatile unsigned long *p, unsigned long old, unsigned long new)
unsigned long prev;
__asm__ __volatile__ (
- PPC_RELEASE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_ENTRY_BARRIER
"1: ldarx %0,0,%2 # __cmpxchg_u64\n\
cmpd 0,%0,%3\n\
bne- 2f\n\
stdcx. %4,0,%2\n\
bne- 1b"
- PPC_ACQUIRE_BARRIER
+ PPC_ATOMIC_EXIT_BARRIER
"\n\
2:"
: "=&r" (prev), "+m" (*p)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists