[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160203142451.41381ff6@xhacker>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:24:51 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
<arm@...nel.org>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] arm64: add Armada 3700 architecture entry
On Tue, 2 Feb 2016 19:07:41 +0100 Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> The Armada 3700 is an mvebu ARM64 SoC using one or two Cortex-A53 cores
> depending of the variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 21074f674bde..7da341f7b90d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
> menu "Platform selection"
>
> +config ARCH_ARMADA_3700
Would it be better to use ARCH_MVEBU? IMHO, there will be more ARMv8 SoCs
from our EBU, do we plan to add one CONFIG_ARMADA_yyzz for each SoC?
> + bool "Armada 3700 SoC Family"
> + help
> + This enables support for Armada 3700 SoC Family. It is is an
> + ARMv8 based chipset belonging to the mvebu family.
> +
> config ARCH_BCM_IPROC
> bool "Broadcom iProc SoC Family"
> help
Powered by blists - more mailing lists