[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160203003547.GD14436@kwestfie-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:35:47 -0800
From: Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@...eaurora.org>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc: Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH RFC 03/15] ASoC: qcom: rename
rdmactl_audif_start to dmactrl_audif_start
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:28:28AM -0800, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> index a6dce1b..bfc9de6 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcmops_hw_params(struct
> snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> unsigned int channels = params_channels(params);
> unsigned int regval;
> int bitwidth;
> - int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->rdmactl_audif_start;
> + int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->dmactl_audif_start;
I was wondering why rdma_port had not been changed as well, until I saw
that in a later patch. Would it make sense to combine all changes
related to removing read-only indications from identifiers to one patch?
--
Kenneth Westfield
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists