linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH RFC 03/15] ASoC: qcom: rename rdmactl_audif_start to dmactrl_audif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B1BEDD.1010000@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:48:29 +0000
From:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To:	Patrick Lai <plai@...eaurora.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	Banajit Goswami <bgoswami@...eaurora.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH RFC 03/15] ASoC: qcom: rename
 rdmactl_audif_start to dmactrl_audif_start



On 03/02/16 00:35, Kenneth Westfield wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 09:28:28AM -0800, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> index a6dce1b..bfc9de6 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/lpass-platform.c
>> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int lpass_platform_pcmops_hw_params(struct
>> snd_pcm_substream *substream,
>>   	unsigned int channels = params_channels(params);
>>   	unsigned int regval;
>>   	int bitwidth;
>> -	int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->rdmactl_audif_start;
>> +	int ret, rdma_port = pcm_data->i2s_port + v->dmactl_audif_start;
>
> I was wondering why rdma_port had not been changed as well, until I saw
> that in a later patch.  Would it make sense to combine all changes
> related to removing read-only indications from identifiers to one patch?

Yep, I will see if I can merge this and also I need to fix the ordering, 
I got same report from 0day testing too.

>