linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: Fix reusable codes in core.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGRGNgXuCfpRVuM7Dxt9QT9TGW1zt9Qh+pqSPJ_X5zHq3A4v4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:54:38 +1100
From:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To:	ByeoungWook Kim <quddnr145@...il.com>
Cc:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
	Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
	Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: Fix reusable codes in core.c

Hi ByeoungWook,

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:52 AM, ByeoungWook Kim <quddnr145@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Julian,
>
> 0xfe and 0xfb was not same codes.
> 0xfe is udelay(50). and 0xfb is mdelay(50).
> It same code like udelay((n) * 1000).

I'm clearly blind! Sorry about that!

> but i agree with your answers of some parts. I think that i should divide
> into separate patch.
> Thanks for your assists!

Not a problem!

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/