lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <56B1D41B.4090602@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 03 Feb 2016 19:19:07 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, javier@....samsung.com
Cc:	cw00.choi@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] mfd: max77686: do not set i2c client data for rtc
 i2c client

On 03.02.2016 18:30, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> There is different RTC I2C address for RTC block in MAX77686.
> Driver is creating dummy i2c client for this address to access
> the register of this IP block.
> 
> As there is no need to get any data from this rtc i2c client,
> it is not required to set client data for this i2c client.
> 
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> CC: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> 
> ---
> This is new in this series based on review comment from V1.
> 

You could trim a little bit the description - "stored pointer is not
retrieved anywhere, there is no call to i2c_get_clientdata()" might be
sufficient but anyway:

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ