[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160203110240.GA8950@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:02:40 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/26] perf tools: Introduce hists specific format entries
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 08:58:53AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:42:16PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 07:22:47PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > Ok, so I rebased it on top of my perf/core branch, adjusting some stuff
> > > wrt recent patchkits from Namhyung (hist_entry__callchain_fprintf() is
> > > no more, etc), and renaming that perf_hpp_list->{list,sort_list} to
> > > ->{fields,sorts} as Namhyung suggested and you agreed, it builds...
> > >
> > > But perf top isn't showing the overhead column... there were some
> > > changes to perf report in this patchkit to move some initializations...
> > > will check there...
> >
> > Fixed, doing the same change you made for 'perf report', moving the
> > setup_sorting call to after the setup_browser one, inserted a new patch
> > with that just before the patch where the problem was bisected, please
> > check.
> >
> > To recap:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=tmp.perf/hists/hpp_list&id=7d105448f8922679956728a7f5106218378c450e
>
> I'll check on that, thanks a lot
it looks ok to me
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists