linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] cpufreq: powernv: Redesign the presentation of throttle notification and solve bug-fixes in the driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160203140157.GF3469@vireshk>
Date:	Wed, 3 Feb 2016 19:31:57 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	pc@...ibm.com, anton@...ba.org, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@...il.com,
	mpe@...erman.id.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] cpufreq: powernv: Redesign the presentation of
 throttle notification and solve bug-fixes in the driver

On 03-02-16, 14:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> It looks like patches [1-5/6] are not objectionable and I can apply
> them without the last one if you want me to.

Looks fine to me.

-- 
viresh