[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FD02A9@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:11:11 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Robert <elliott@....com>, "Brian Gerst" <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 2/4] x86, mce: Check for faults tagged in
EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT exception table entries
>> which is used to indicate that the machine check was triggered by code
>> in the kernel with a EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT fixup entry.
>
> I think that the EXTABLE_CLASS_FAULT references no longer match the code.
You'd think that checkpatch could have spotted that the commit comment mentions
an identifier that doesn't appear in the patch :-)
Will update.
Thanks
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists