[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8562433.7oWe1ikqcL@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:23:18 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>
Cc: tj@...nel.org, hdegoede@...hat.com, david.daney@...ium.com,
aleksey.makarov@...iumnetworks.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] SATA: OCTEON: support SATA on OCTEON platform
On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:02:05 Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel wrote:
> Hence, I find the original binding simpler and easier to understand when looking at the hardware manual
>
> + uctl@...006c000000 {
> + compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-sata-uctl";
> + reg = <0x11800 0x6c000000 0x0 0x100>;
> + ranges; /* Direct mapping */
> + dma-ranges;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + sata: sata@...0000000000 {
> + compatible = "cavium,octeon-7130-ahci";
> + reg = <0x16c00 0x00000000 0x0 0x200>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&cibsata>;
> + interrupts = <2 4>; /* Bit: 2, level */
> + };
> + };
>
> Is it possible to let this example go in as is?
>
I don't have the hardware manual, so I'm just guessing what the hardware
looks like. If the manual describes the device as a bridge with a 1:1 mapping,
then your existing example above absolutely makes sense.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists