linux-kernel - [PATCH 13/29] perf hists: Separate sort fields parsing into setup_sort

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1454517258-12360-14-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed,  3 Feb 2016 13:34:02 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 13/29] perf hists: Separate sort fields parsing into setup_sort_list function

From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

Separating sort fields parsing into setup_sort_list function, so it's
separated from sort_order string setup and could be reused later in
following patches.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1453109064-1026-13-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/sort.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
index b5389a54356d..ab1c21a950f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c
@@ -2241,6 +2241,26 @@ static int sort_dimension__add(const char *tok,
 	return -ESRCH;
 }
 
+static int setup_sort_list(char *str, struct perf_evlist *evlist)
+{
+	char *tmp, *tok;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	for (tok = strtok_r(str, ", ", &tmp);
+			tok; tok = strtok_r(NULL, ", ", &tmp)) {
+		ret = sort_dimension__add(tok, evlist);
+		if (ret == -EINVAL) {
+			error("Invalid --sort key: `%s'", tok);
+			break;
+		} else if (ret == -ESRCH) {
+			error("Unknown --sort key: `%s'", tok);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static const char *get_default_sort_order(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
 {
 	const char *default_sort_orders[] = {
@@ -2335,7 +2355,7 @@ static char *setup_overhead(char *keys)
 
 static int __setup_sorting(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
 {
-	char *tmp, *tok, *str;
+	char *str;
 	const char *sort_keys;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -2373,17 +2393,7 @@ static int __setup_sorting(struct perf_evlist *evlist)
 		}
 	}
 
-	for (tok = strtok_r(str, ", ", &tmp);
-			tok; tok = strtok_r(NULL, ", ", &tmp)) {
-		ret = sort_dimension__add(tok, evlist);
-		if (ret == -EINVAL) {
-			error("Invalid --sort key: `%s'", tok);
-			break;
-		} else if (ret == -ESRCH) {
-			error("Unknown --sort key: `%s'", tok);
-			break;
-		}
-	}
+	ret = setup_sort_list(str, evlist);
 
 	free(str);
 	return ret;
-- 
2.5.0