From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>

Playing with SCHED_DEADLINE and cpusets, I found that I was unable to create
new SCHED_DEADLINE tasks, with the error of EBUSY as if the bandwidth was
already used up. I then realized there wa no way to see what bandwidth is
used by the runqueues to debug the issue.

By adding the dl_bw->bw and dl_bw->total_bw to the output of the deadline
info in /proc/sched_debug, this allows us to see what bandwidth has been
reserved and where a problem may exist.

For example, before the issue we see the ratio of the bandwidth:

 # cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us
 950000
 # cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_period_us
 1000000

  # grep dl /proc/sched_debug
  dl_rq[0]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[1]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[2]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[3]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[4]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[5]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[6]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0
  dl_rq[7]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 0

Note: (950000 / 1000000) << 20 == 996147

After I played with cpusets and hit the issue, the result is now:

  # grep dl /proc/sched_debug
  dl_rq[0]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -104857
  dl_rq[1]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 104857
  dl_rq[2]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 104857
  dl_rq[3]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : 104857
  dl_rq[4]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -104857
  dl_rq[5]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -104857
  dl_rq[6]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -104857
  dl_rq[7]:
    .dl_nr_running                 : 0
    .dl_bw->bw                     : 996147
    .dl_bw->total_bw               : -104857

This shows that there is definitely a problem as we should never have a
negative total bandwidth.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/sched/debug.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index a5625e793d15..a1f161a7500e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -562,8 +562,17 @@ void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
 
 void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
 {
+	struct dl_bw *dl_bw;
+
 	SEQ_printf(m, "\ndl_rq[%d]:\n", cpu);
 	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %ld\n", "dl_nr_running", dl_rq->dl_nr_running);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	dl_bw = &cpu_rq(cpu)->rd->dl_bw;
+#else
+	dl_bw = &dl_rq->dl_bw;
+#endif
+	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %lld\n", "dl_bw->bw", dl_bw->bw);
+	SEQ_printf(m, "  .%-30s: %lld\n", "dl_bw->total_bw", dl_bw->total_bw);
 }
 
 extern __read_mostly int sched_clock_running;
-- 
2.6.4