[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160204145952.53f536f5d4cdef96844104b7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:59:52 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Madars Vitolins <m@...odev.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
mtk.manpages@...il.com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
viro@....linux.org.uk, normalperson@...t.net, corbet@....net,
luto@...capital.net, hagen@...u.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT
On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 23:44:05 +0200 Madars Vitolins <m@...odev.com> wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
>
> Just run off the original tests with this patch (eventpoll.c from
> 4.5-rc2 + patch bellow). Got the same good results, no regression.
>
> $ time ./bankcl
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 1359856158.04 USD
> Account balance is: 101528948.40 USD
>
> real 0m41.826s
> user 0m29.513s
> sys 0m6.490s
>
>
> Test case:
> https://mvitolin.wordpress.com/2015/12/05/endurox-testing-epollexclusive-flag/
>
> PS,
>
> Original cases 0m24.953s vs 0m41.826s now probably is related with my pc
> setup. As I just now re-run test with original patch, got the same ~41
> sec.
>
> So I am fine with this patch!
>
Thanks, I shall add your Tested-by:
One thing we're sorely missing is an epoll test suite, in
tools/testing/selftests. If anyone has anything which we can use to
kick things off, please hand it over ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists