[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6XcGqLeo+8WorTgrBqGQe3kPQ+Lw5QFt+rAno4K+8EZ3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 16:08:55 -0800
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Pere Monclus <pmonclus@...mgrid.com>, GLin@...e.coma,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Brenden Blanco <bblanco@...mgrid.com>,
Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 02/11] xen/hvmlite: Bootstrap HVMlite guest
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...e.com> wrote:
>> If you still desperately want to avoid multiple entry points, then just
>> insist on using grub for the VM. I expect that that is how most people
>> will end up using HVMLite VMs anyway.
>
> Are you saying Grub can do some of this heavy lifting that I am trying
> to avoid? If so that'd be great news.
Come to think of it, it would still leave the same semantic gap issue,
which is one of the reasons I'm pushing for a solution for that now.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists