[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZDOPYDVUUXBXc7OEmAo0QEryg0PvMLXUxA__Rxu8bS=0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:51:26 +0200
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>
To: Michael Welling <mwelling@...e.org>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
linux@...ck-us.net, eibach@...ys.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: adc: Add TI ADS1015 ADC driver support
> Would it be more consistent to handle the mutex outside of the switch above similar
> to how it is handled in ads1015_write_raw?
>
> Also the ads1015_set_power_state(data, false) is called either way so why not just
> use one call?
>
I don't have a strong preference for that. I think across IIO drivers
we can find both coding practices.
Indeed consistency with ads1015_write_raw is a good argument. Will fix it.
I will leave the code here for one more day and then send an updated version.
thanks,
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists