linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] powerpc: Simplify test in __dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B35537.3050708@c-s.fr>
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:42:15 +0100
From:	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
To:	Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>
Cc:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
	Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 21/23] powerpc: Simplify test in __dma_sync()



Le 04/02/2016 12:37, Denis Kirjanov a écrit :
> On 2/4/16, Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
>> This simplification helps the compiler. We now have only one test
>> instead of two, so it reduces the number of branches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
>> ---
>> v2: new
>> v3: no change
>> v4: no change
>> v5: no change
>>
>>   arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> b/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> index 169aba4..2dc74e5 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/dma-noncoherent.c
>> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ void __dma_sync(void *vaddr, size_t size, int direction)
>>   		 * invalidate only when cache-line aligned otherwise there is
>>   		 * the potential for discarding uncommitted data from the cache
>>   		 */
>> -		if ((start & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1)) || (size & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1)))
>> +		if ((start | end) & (L1_CACHE_BYTES - 1))
>>   			flush_dcache_range(start, end);
>>   		else
>>   			invalidate_dcache_range(start, end);
> The previous version of address cache-line aligned check reads perfectly fine.
> What's the benefit of this micro optimization?
With this optimisation we avoid one unneccessary test and two associated 
jumps. Taking into account that __dma_sync() is one of the top ten CPU 
consummers, I believe it is worth it:

Without the patch:

c000d894:    70 6a 00 0f     andi.   r10,r3,15
c000d898:    39 29 00 0f     addi    r9,r9,15
c000d89c:    54 63 00 36     rlwinm  r3,r3,0,0,27
c000d8a0:    7d 23 48 50     subf    r9,r3,r9
c000d8a4:    41 82 00 84     beq     c000d928 <__dma_sync+0xb8>
[...]
c000d8c0:    7c 00 04 ac     sync
c000d8c4:    4e 80 00 20     blr
[...]
c000d928:    70 8a 00 0f     andi.   r10,r4,15
c000d92c:    40 a2 ff 7c     bne     c000d8a8 <__dma_sync+0x38>
c000d930:    55 2a e1 3f     rlwinm. r10,r9,28,4,31
c000d934:    41 a2 ff 8c     beq     c000d8c0 <__dma_sync+0x50>

With the patch:

c000d894:    7c 89 1b 78     or      r9,r4,r3
c000d898:    71 2a 00 0f     andi.   r10,r9,15
c000d89c:    54 63 00 36     rlwinm  r3,r3,0,0,27
c000d8a0:    38 84 00 0f     addi    r4,r4,15
c000d8a4:    7c 83 20 50     subf    r4,r3,r4
c000d8a8:    41 82 00 84     beq     c000d92c <__dma_sync+0xbc>
[...]
c000d8c4:    7c 00 04 ac     sync
c000d8c8:    4e 80 00 20     blr
[...]
c000d92c:    54 89 e1 3f     rlwinm. r9,r4,28,4,31
c000d930:    41 a2 ff 94     beq     c000d8c4 <__dma_sync+0x54>


Christophe
>> --
>> 2.1.0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev