[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160204145148.GA26361@localhost>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:51:48 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@...inx.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"paul.burton@...tec.com" <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"wangyijing@...wei.com" <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"russell.joyce@...k.ac.uk" <russell.joyce@...k.ac.uk>,
Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
"jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com" <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] Microblaze: Modifying microblaze PCI subsytem to
support generic Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge IP driver
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:49:20AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] Microblaze: Modifying microblaze PCI subsytem
> > to support generic Xilinx AXI PCIe Host Bridge IP driver
> >
> > [+cc Ben for real this time]
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:32:07AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > [+cc Ben, pcibios_get_phb_of_node() question]
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:06:13PM +0530, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > > > This patch does required modifications to microblaze PCI subsystem,
> > > > to work with generic driver (drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c) on
> > > > Microblaze and Zynq.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@...inx.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@...inx.com> ...
> > >
> > > > resource_size_t pcibios_align_resource(void *data, const struct resource
> > *res,
> > > > resource_size_t size, resource_size_t align) {
> > > > - struct pci_dev *dev = data;
> > > > resource_size_t start = res->start;
> > > >
> > > > - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) {
> > > > - if (skip_isa_ioresource_align(dev))
> > > > - return start;
> > > > - if (start & 0x300)
> > > > - start = (start + 0x3ff) & ~0x3ff;
> > > > - }
> > > > -
> > > > return start;
> > >
> > > "return res->start;" is sufficient; no need for a temporary variable.
> > >
> Agreed will address in next patch.
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_align_resource);
> > > >
> > > > +int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev) {
> > > > + dev->irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, 0, 0);
> > > > +
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_add_device);
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * Reparent resource children of pr that conflict with res
> > > > * under res, and make res replace those children.
> > > > @@ -1335,9 +1308,21 @@ static void
> > > > pcibios_setup_phb_resources(struct pci_controller *hose,
> > > >
> > > > struct device_node *pcibios_get_phb_of_node(struct pci_bus *bus) {
> > > > - struct pci_controller *hose = bus->sysdata;
> > > > + struct device_node *np;
> > > > +
> > > > + for_each_node_by_type(np, "pci") {
> > > > + const void *prop;
> > > > + unsigned int bus_min;
> > > > +
> > > > + prop = of_get_property(np, "bus-range", NULL);
> > > > + if (!prop)
> > > > + continue;
> > > > + bus_min = be32_to_cpup(prop);
> > > > + if (bus->number == bus_min)
> > > > + return np;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > - return of_node_get(hose->dn);
> > > > + return NULL;
> > >
> > > Hmmm. The old microblaze code ("return of_node_get(hose->dn);") is
> > > basically the same as the mips and powerpc versions. The new code is
> > > basically the same as the x86 version.
> > >
> > > I like the generic weak version in drivers/pci/of.c because it doesn't
> > > use any arch-specific data, and it looks like if we just set the
> > > struct device.of_node members correctly, everything should Just Work.
> > >
> > > But Ben added both the generic and the x86 versions the same day, so
> > > there must be some complication:
> > >
> > > 98d9f30c820d ("pci/of: Match PCI devices to OF nodes dynamically")
> > > 3d5fe5a65af9 ("x86/devicetree: Use generic PCI <-> OF matching")
> > >
> > > So I guess my question is, why do we need a microblaze-specific
> > > version at all?
> > >
> I did not notice the weak version in /pci/of.c, I have tested with
> weak version also and it is working. We might not need this
> microblaze specific version, but will wait for ben's reply.
If the generic version works, and you don't need the microblaze-
specific version, just remove it and we'll get this wrapped up. No
need to wait for Ben.
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists