[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B2BC7B.4070807@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:20:35 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
<javier@....samsung.com>
CC: <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] rtc: max77686: move initialisation of rtc regmap,
irq chip locally
Hi Javier,
On Thursday 04 February 2016 07:33 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Thursday 04 February 2016 05:40 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03.02.2016 22:47, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>> Changes from V2:
>>> - Taken care of missed sequence for removing the resource.
>>> - Fix the crash when doing unbind by using requested_threaded_irq()
>>> instead of demv_requested_threaded_irq().
>>>
>>> drivers/mfd/max77686.c | 85 +-------------------
>>> drivers/rtc/rtc-max77686.c | 148
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h | 3 -
>>> 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 106 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Looks good and works properly (RTC, unbind/rebind, wakealarm again)
>> but... after applying this patch the device cannot suspend to RAM after
>> unbind/rebind.
>>
>> Reproduce path, after booting:
>> $ echo max77686-rtc > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/max77686-rtc/unbind
>> $ echo max77686-rtc > /sys/bus/platform/drivers/max77686-rtc/bind
>> $ rtcwake -d rtc2 -m mem -s 5 -v
>> (or instead of rtcwake: echo mem > /sys/power/state)
>
Can you please also try to test in your setup which have MAX77802?
On this, we do not create i2c client and do regmap_init_i2c. So may be
it helps on narrow down the issue.
>
> My device does not support suspend and hence I can nto test this part
> and need your help to debug it.
>
> Few question to narrow down:
> 1. Have you try to bind/unbind mfd driver to make sure that there is
> no inherent issue in the framework driver?
>
> 2. Does suspend entry and wake alarm work if you dont do unbind and
> just bind it and enter into suspend?
>
> 3. Can you try locally to not use devm_regmap_init_i2c() and just use
> the regmap_init_i2c() and proper removal of this from error path and
> remove callback?
>
>
>
> Three things we are doing new on this movement, i2c client creating,
> regmap_init and adding irq chip.
> And probably some issue on this calls?
> Let's try with not using devm_ * for this calls?
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists