linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] SYNC_NOIDLE preemption for ancestor cgroups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160204164344.GA28384@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:43:44 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] SYNC_NOIDLE preemption for ancestor cgroups

On Tue 12-01-16 10:10:35, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 08:24 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >Hello Jens,
> >
> >This is v3 of the patch series.
> >
> >Changes since v2:
> >* added acks from Tejun
> >* fixed some typos pointed out by Tejun
> >* fixed condition checking for too long think time in patch 1/5
> >
> >Changes since v1:
> >* added missing export of cgroup_is_descendant()
> >
> >If you find the series too hasty for the current merge window, just postpone it
> >for the next one.
> 
> This series looks good to me, I'd like to push it in this round. Good work,
> Jan!

So did this happen? I don't see patches anywhere in your tree or in Linus'?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR