[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454619328.3263.4.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 12:55:28 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS: trim the file triggers for ABI/API
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 07:34 -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:05:19PM +0100, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Might I suggest an alternate commit message?
>
> """
> Commit ea8f8fc8631 ("MAINTAINERS: add linux-api for review of API/ABI
> changes") added file triggers for various paths that likely indicated
> API/ABI changes. However, catching all changes in Documentation/ABI/
> and include/uapi/ produces a large volume of mail to linux-api, rather
> than only API/ABI changes. Drop those two entries, but leave
> include/linux/syscalls.h and kernel/sys_ni.c to catch syscall-related
> changes.
> """
[]
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
[]
> > @@ -223,9 +223,7 @@ F: drivers/scsi/aacraid/
> >
> > ABI/API
> > L: linux-api@...r.kernel.org
> > -F: Documentation/ABI/
> > F: include/linux/syscalls.h
> > -F: include/uapi/
> > F: kernel/sys_ni.c
Maybe add a keyword entry like:
K: (?i)syscall
to see all actual changes of syscalls too?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists