[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160204143007.674a7e847b4c8fed957bba7c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:30:07 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: syzkaller@...glegroups.com, vegard.nossum@...cle.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, taviso@...gle.com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com,
kcc@...gle.com, edumazet@...gle.com, glider@...gle.com,
keescook@...gle.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, sasha.levin@...cle.com,
drysdale@...gle.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, ryabinin.a.a@...il.com,
kirill@...temov.name, jslaby@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] kernel: add kcov code coverage
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016 16:40:41 +0100 Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:
> kcov provides code coverage collection for coverage-guided fuzzing
> (randomized testing). Coverage-guided fuzzing is a testing technique
> that uses coverage feedback to determine new interesting inputs to a
> system. A notable user-space example is AFL
> (http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/). However, this technique is not
> widely used for kernel testing due to missing compiler and kernel
> support.
>
> kcov does not aim to collect as much coverage as possible. It aims
> to collect more or less stable coverage that is function of syscall
> inputs. To achieve this goal it does not collect coverage in
> soft/hard interrupts and instrumentation of some inherently
> non-deterministic or non-interesting parts of kernel is disbled
> (e.g. scheduler, locking).
>
> Currently there is a single coverage collection mode (tracing),
> but the API anticipates additional collection modes.
> Initially I also implemented a second mode which exposes
> coverage in a fixed-size hash table of counters (what Quentin
> used in his original patch). I've dropped the second mode for
> simplicity.
>
> This patch adds the necessary support on kernel side.
> The complimentary compiler support was added in gcc revision 231296.
>
> We've used this support to build syzkaller system call fuzzer,
> which has found 90 kernel bugs in just 2 months:
> https://github.com/google/syzkaller/wiki/Found-Bugs
> We've also found 30+ bugs in our internal systems with syzkaller.
> Another (yet unexplored) direction where kcov coverage would greatly
> help is more traditional "blob mutation". For example, mounting
> a random blob as a filesystem, or receiving a random blob over wire.
>
> Why not gcov. Typical fuzzing loop looks as follows: (1) reset
> coverage, (2) execute a bit of code, (3) collect coverage, repeat.
> A typical coverage can be just a dozen of basic blocks (e.g. an
> invalid input). In such context gcov becomes prohibitively expensive
> as reset/collect coverage steps depend on total number of basic
> blocks/edges in program (in case of kernel it is about 2M). Cost of
> kcov depends only on number of executed basic blocks/edges. On top of
> that, kernel requires per-thread coverage because there are
> always background threads and unrelated processes that also produce
> coverage. With inlined gcov instrumentation per-thread coverage is not
> possible.
>
> kcov exposes kernel PCs and control flow to user-space which
> is insecure. But debugfs should not be mapped as user accessible.
So the proposed user interface is ioctls against /sys/kernel/debug/kcov.
I guess that's OK. We could just add sys_kcov() - syscalls are cheap
enough. But we store state within the fd, don't we? So sys_kcov()
would take an fd argument.
> Based on a patch by Quentin Casasnovas.
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> Anticipating reasonable questions regarding usage of this feature.
> Quentin Casasnovas and Vegard Nossum also plan to use kcov for
> coverage-guided fuzzing. Currently they use a custom kernel patch
> for their fuzzer and found several dozens of bugs.
> There is also interest from Intel 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1811,6 +1811,16 @@ struct task_struct {
> /* bitmask and counter of trace recursion */
> unsigned long trace_recursion;
> #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KCOV
> + /* Coverage collection mode enabled for this task (0 if disabled). */
> + int kcov_mode;
Should really be enum kcov_mode. We could move it into <linux/kcov.h>:
--- a/include/linux/kcov.h~kernel-add-kcov-code-coverage-fix
+++ a/include/linux/kcov.h
@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ struct task_struct;
void kcov_task_init(struct task_struct *t);
void kcov_task_exit(struct task_struct *t);
+enum kcov_mode {
+ /*
+ * Tracing coverage collection mode.
+ * Covered PCs are collected in a per-task buffer.
+ */
+ KCOV_MODE_TRACE = 1,
+};
+
#else
static inline void kcov_task_init(struct task_struct *t) {}
--- a/include/linux/sched.h~kernel-add-kcov-code-coverage-fix
+++ a/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct sched_param {
#include <linux/resource.h>
#include <linux/timer.h>
#include <linux/hrtimer.h>
+#include <linux/kcov.h>
#include <linux/task_io_accounting.h>
#include <linux/latencytop.h>
#include <linux/cred.h>
@@ -1814,7 +1815,7 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */
#ifdef CONFIG_KCOV
/* Coverage collection mode enabled for this task (0 if disabled). */
- int kcov_mode;
+ enum kcov_mode kcov_mode;
/* Size of the kcov_area. */
unsigned kcov_size;
/* Buffer for coverage collection. */
--- a/kernel/kcov.c~kernel-add-kcov-code-coverage-fix
+++ a/kernel/kcov.c
@@ -13,14 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/kcov.h>
-enum kcov_mode {
- /*
- * Tracing coverage collection mode.
- * Covered PCs are collected in a per-task buffer.
- */
- KCOV_MODE_TRACE = 1,
-};
-
/*
* kcov descriptor (one per opened debugfs file).
* State transitions of the descriptor:
>
> ...
>
> +/*
> + * kcov descriptor (one per opened debugfs file).
> + * State transitions of the descriptor:
> + * - initial state after open()
> + * - then there must be a single ioctl(KCOV_INIT_TRACE) call
> + * - then, mmap() call (several calls are allowed but not useful)
> + * - then, repeated enable/disable for a task (only one task a time allowed)
> + */
> +struct kcov {
> + /*
> + * Reference counter. We keep one for:
> + * - opened file descriptor
> + * - task with enabled coverage (we can't unwire it from another task)
> + */
> + atomic_t rc;
"rc" usually means "return code". Calling this "refcount" would cause
less surprise.
> + /* The lock protects mode, size, area and t. */
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + enum kcov_mode mode;
> + unsigned size;
> + void *area;
> + struct task_struct *t;
Can we get some documentation in place for the above? I find that
documenting the data structures is more valuable than documenting the
code.
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Entry point from instrumented code.
> + * This is called once per basic-block/edge.
> + */
> +void __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(void)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t;
> + enum kcov_mode mode;
> +
> + t = current;
> + /*
> + * We are interested in code coverage as a function of a syscall inputs,
> + * so we ignore code executed in interrupts.
> + */
> + if (!t || in_interrupt())
> + return;
> + mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode);
> + if (mode == KCOV_MODE_TRACE) {
> + unsigned long *area;
> + unsigned long pos;
> +
> + /*
> + * There is some code that runs in interrupts but for which
> + * in_interrupt() returns false (e.g. preempt_schedule_irq()).
> + * READ_ONCE()/barrier() effectively provides load-acquire wrt
> + * interrupts, there are paired barrier()/WRITE_ONCE() in
> + * kcov_ioctl_locked().
> + */
> + barrier();
> + area = t->kcov_area;
> + /* The first word is number of subsequent PCs. */
> + pos = READ_ONCE(area[0]) + 1;
> + if (likely(pos < t->kcov_size)) {
> + area[pos] = _RET_IP_;
> + WRITE_ONCE(area[0], pos);
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc);
Why is this exported to modules? gcc emits the call?
>
> ...
>
> +static int kcov_mmap(struct file *filep, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> + int res = 0;
> + void *area;
> + struct kcov *kcov = vma->vm_file->private_data;
> + unsigned long size, off;
> + struct page *page;
> +
> + area = vmalloc_user(vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start);
> + if (!area)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + spin_lock(&kcov->lock);
> + size = kcov->size * sizeof(unsigned long);
> + if (kcov->mode == 0 || vma->vm_pgoff != 0 ||
kcov->mode has type `enum kcov_mode'. We should hard-wire a zero in
here: neater to create KCOV_MODE_DISABLED or whatever? In multiple
places.
> + vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start != size) {
> + res = -EINVAL;
> + goto exit;
> + }
> + if (!kcov->area) {
> + kcov->area = area;
> + vma->vm_flags |= VM_DONTEXPAND;
> + spin_unlock(&kcov->lock);
> + for (off = 0; off < size; off += PAGE_SIZE) {
> + page = vmalloc_to_page(kcov->area + off);
> + if (vm_insert_page(vma, vma->vm_start + off, page))
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "vm_insert_page() failed");
> + }
> + return 0;
> + }
> +exit:
> + spin_unlock(&kcov->lock);
> + vfree(area);
> + return res;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
> +static int kcov_ioctl_locked(struct kcov *kcov, unsigned int cmd,
> + unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct task_struct *t;
> +
> + switch (cmd) {
> + case KCOV_INIT_TRACE:
> + /*
> + * Enable kcov in trace mode and setup buffer size.
> + * Must happen before anything else.
> + * Size must be at least 2 to hold current position and one PC.
> + */
> + if (arg < 2 || arg > INT_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (kcov->mode != 0)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + kcov->mode = KCOV_MODE_TRACE;
> + kcov->size = arg;
kcov->size comes in from userspace and later get multiplied by
sizeof(unsigned long). This means that userspace can trigger math
overflows (on 32-bit if that happens) and havoc might ensue. So can we
please get some better checks in place for `size'?
Also, move these checks (of `arg') so they immediately precede this
*usage* of `arg' so the reader can better see what's happening.
> + return 0;
> + case KCOV_ENABLE:
> + /*
> + * Enable coverage for the current task.
> + * At this point user must have been enabled trace mode,
> + * and mmapped the file. Coverage collection is disabled only
> + * at task exit or voluntary by KCOV_DISABLE. After that it can
> + * be enabled for another task.
> + */
> + if (arg != 0 || kcov->mode == 0 || kcov->area == NULL)
> + return -EINVAL;
This reader doesn't know what is in "arg". Documentation, please. Or
copy `arg' into a suitably named local.
> + if (kcov->t != NULL)
> + return -EBUSY;
> + t = current;
> + /* Cache in task struct for performance. */
> + t->kcov_size = kcov->size;
> + t->kcov_area = kcov->area;
> + /* See comment in __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc(). */
> + barrier();
> + WRITE_ONCE(t->kcov_mode, kcov->mode);
> + t->kcov = kcov;
> + kcov->t = t;
> + /* This is put either in kcov_task_exit() or in KCOV_DISABLE. */
> + kcov_get(kcov);
We didn't get a ref on the task_struct. I guess that's OK because
task_struct.kcov gets torn down in kcov_task_exit().
But what happens if userspace simply closes the fd without running
KCOV_DISABLE? ?
> + return 0;
> + case KCOV_DISABLE:
> + /* Disable coverage for the current task. */
> + if (arg != 0 || current->kcov != kcov)
> + return -EINVAL;
This reader doesn't know what `arg' means.
> + t = current;
> + if (WARN_ON(kcov->t != t))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + kcov_task_init(t);
> + kcov->t = NULL;
> + kcov_put(kcov);
> + return 0;
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
For reasons I don't recall, we conventionally return -ENOTTY for
unimplemented ioctl modes. Alan Cox will remember ;)
http://www.makelinux.net/ldd3/chp-6-sect-1 says
: This error code is interpreted by the C library as "inappropriate ioctl
: for device," which is usually exactly what the programmer needs to
: hear. It's still pretty common, though, to return -EINVAL in response
: to an invalid ioctl command.
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static long kcov_ioctl(struct file *filep, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + struct kcov *kcov;
> + int res;
> +
> + kcov = filep->private_data;
> + spin_lock(&kcov->lock);
> + res = kcov_ioctl_locked(kcov, cmd, arg);
> + spin_unlock(&kcov->lock);
> + return res;
> +}
Wait. `unsigned long arg' is going to be a 32-bit quantity when a
32-bit executable is running on a 64-bit kernel. Doesn't this ioctl
need compat handling?
>
> ...
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists