linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Radix tree retry bug fix & test case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALYGNiPopvgU0xqpykK2MfB3ejh_mq5M99FB4D47F11h3Entgg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 07:56:07 +0300
From:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Radix tree retry bug fix & test case

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Matthew Wilcox
<matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com> wrote:
> Konstantin pointed out my braino when using radix_tree_iter_retry(),
> and then pointed out a second braino.  I think we can fix both brainos
> with one simple test (the advantage of having your braino pointed out
> to you is that you know what you were expecting to happen, so you can
> sometimes propose simlpy making happen what you expected to happen.
> Konstantin doesn't have access to my though tprocesses.)
>
> Kontantin wrote a really great test ... and then didn't add it to the
> test suite.  That made me sad, so I added it.

I haven't seen them, I wasn't in CC. And I prefer testing in vivo if possible.

>
> Andrew, can you drop radix-tree-fix-oops-after-radix_tree_iter_retry.patch
> from your tree and add these two patches instead?  If you prefer
> Konstantin's fix to this one, I'll send you another patch to fix the
> second problem Konstantin pointed out.

Nak. Mine version generates better code. radix_tree_next_slot is a hot place.
Please fix second problem in your helper separately.

>
> I was a bit unsure about the proper attribution here.  The essentials
> of the test-suite change from Konstantin are unchanged, but he didn't
> have his own sign-off on it.  So I made him 'From' and only added my
> own sign-off.
>
> Konstantin Khlebnikov (1):
>   radix-tree tests: Add regression3 test
>
> Matthew Wilcox (1):
>   radix-tree: fix oops after radix_tree_iter_retry
>
>  include/linux/radix-tree.h              |  3 ++
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/Makefile       |  2 +-
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/linux/kernel.h |  1 +
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/main.c         |  1 +
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/regression.h   |  1 +
>  tools/testing/radix-tree/regression3.c  | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  6 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/radix-tree/regression3.c
>
> --
> 2.7.0.rc3
>