[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160205070917.GF21792@vireshk>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:39:17 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/10] cpufreq: governor: Avoid passing dbs_data
pointers around unnecessarily
On 05-02-16, 03:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Do not pass struct dbs_data pointers to the family of functions
> implementing governor operations in cpufreq_governor.c as they can
> take that pointer from policy->governor by themselves.
>
> The cpufreq_governor_init() case is slightly more complicated, since
> policy->governor may be NULL when it is invoked, but then it can reach
> the pointer in question via its cdata argument just fine.
>
> While at it, rework cpufreq_governor_dbs() to avoid a pointless
> policy_governor check in the CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 68 ++++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Took some time to review, but it looks nice cleanup :)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists