linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160205091510.GM21792@vireshk>
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:45:10 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from
 dbs_check_cpu()

On 05-02-16, 03:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to
> dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because
> the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c |    2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c     |    5 +++--
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h     |    2 +-
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |    6 ++----
>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh