[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABeXuvqBYcgrMzjqesz+m37A3UzxCixkWvg8OyO5AdraMnQu-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:39:08 -0800
From: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To: dsterba@...e.cz, Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] fs: btrfs: Replace CURRENT_TIME by current_fs_time()
The kernel tester found a dereferencing NULL pointer issue with this patch.
I think this is the fix:
--- a/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/root-tree.c
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ void btrfs_update_root_times(struct
btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_root *root)
{
struct btrfs_root_item *item = &root->root_item;
- struct timespec ct = current_fs_time(root->ino_cache_inode->i_sb);
+ struct timespec ct = current_fs_time(root->fs_info->sb);
I will test and re-post the patch.
-Deepa
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:14 AM, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:07:50PM -0800, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> CURRENT_TIME macro is not appropriate for filesystems as it
>> doesn't use the right granularity for filesystem timestamps.
>> Use current_fs_time() instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
>> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
>> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
>> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
>> Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
>
> There's no actual change for btrfs as it uses granularity 1 which is a
> no-op and equivalent to CURRENT_TIME.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists