[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8760y3aprp.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 09:51:06 +0800
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [mm] 63c6a211b0: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/memory.c:1207
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2016 08:46:03 +0800 kernel test robot <ying.huang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> commit 63c6a211b0eb5b1c86ffdd9d89639fb7f1b70fca ("mm: workingset: per-cgroup cache thrash detection")
>>
>>
>> [ 8.134495] No soundcards found.
>> [ 8.137598] debug: unmapping init [mem 0xffffffff81cdc000-0xffffffff81d99fff]
>> [ 8.137598] debug: unmapping init [mem 0xffffffff81cdc000-0xffffffff81d99fff]
>> [ 8.155388] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/memory.c:1207
>> [ 8.155388] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/memory.c:1207
>> [ 8.158212] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 79, name: mount
>> [ 8.158212] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 79, name: mount
>> [ 8.160436] 1 lock held by mount/79:
>> [ 8.160436] 1 lock held by mount/79:
>> [ 8.161488] #0:
>> [ 8.161488] #0: ( (rcu_read_lockrcu_read_lock){......}){......}, at:
>> , at: [<ffffffff810e4cc9>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x20
>> [<ffffffff810e4cc9>] rcu_lock_acquire+0x0/0x20
>> [ 8.164136] Preemption disabled at:
>> [ 8.164136] Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8106a358>] vprintk_default+0x18/0x1a
>> [<ffffffff8106a358>] vprintk_default+0x18/0x1a
>
> I'm not sure why this is pointing at vprintk_default...
>
> mm-workingset-per-cgroup-cache-thrash-detection.patch does have a bug
> which could cause this. It's fixed by
> mm-workingset-per-cgroup-cache-thrash-detection-fix.patch. Was the
> -fix patch applied during this testing?
The original test is for linux-next tree of 2016-02-03, which hasn't the
fix patch. The fix patch is merged by linux-next 2016-02-04. I queued
the same test for the fix patch and there is no such bug as above.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists