[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160205140517.GE3305@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:05:17 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@....de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables
On Mon 2016-01-25 16:29:54, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> index ef8b916..29b7014 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ftrace.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@
>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> +#if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS) && defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && \
> + !defined(CC_USING_MPROFILE_KERNEL)
> +#error "DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS requires working -mprofile-kernel"
> +#endif
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS is automatically enabled when
both CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE and HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
are enabled.
Therefore it is not possible to build kernel with broken gcc
and DYNAMIC_FTRACE.
IMHO, we need to allow to explicitely disable DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
if the compiler is broken to get around this build error.
We either need to define DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS as a proper
bool with description, help text, ... Or we need a way to
explicitely disable HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS. Or something
like this.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists