[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160205153258.GW4455@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:32:58 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: Add coupled regulator
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:33:28PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:28:02PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 04:46:49PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Anyway, I'm fine with both approaches, just let me know what you
> > > prefer.
> > Without seeing an implementation of the lists it's hard to say.
> Just to make sure we're on the same page: you want to keep the
> regulator, but instead of giving the parent through vinX-supplies
> properties, you want to have a single *-supply property, with a list
> of regulators, right?
Either that or an explicit regulator describing the merge. Rob wants
the list I think but I really don't care.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists