linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Enable and verify MMIO access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:34:54 +0000
From:	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Enable and verify MMIO
 access

On 05/02/16 15:32, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 02/05/2016 04:29 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 01/02/16 19:58, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 02/01, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>> So far, we have been blindly assuming that having access to a
>>>> memory-mapped timer frame implies that the individual elements of that
>>>> frame frame are already enabled. Whilst it's the firmware's job to give
>>>> us non-secure access to frames in the first place, we should not rely
>>>> on implementations always being generous enough to also configure
>>>> CNTACR
>>>> for those non-secure frames (e.g. [1]).
>>>>
>>>> Explicitly enable feature-level access per-frame, and verify that the
>>>> access we want is really implemented before trying to make use of it.
>>>>
>>>> [1]:https://github.com/ARM-software/tf-issues/issues/170
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>>> Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>>
>> Great, thanks!
>>
>> Daniel, am I right in hoping this is something you'll pick up, or should
>> I be resending it to arm-soc?
>
> I will be reviewing timers patches next week. I will take care of this one.

Cool, thanks for the confirmation.

Robin.

>
> Thanks
>    -- Daniel
>
>
>