[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B4C1E1.6060408@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 07:38:09 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] numa: fix /proc/<pid>/numa_maps for THP
On 02/05/2016 07:34 AM, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> +static struct page *can_gather_numa_stats_pmd(pmd_t pmd,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long addr)
> +{
Is there a way to do this without making a copy of most of
can_gather_numa_stats()? Seems like the kind of thing where the pmd
version will bitrot.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists