[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2367498.ClbHvSsNAg@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:21:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] cpufreq: governor: Drop cpu argument from dbs_check_cpu()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Since policy->cpu is always passed as the second argument to
dbs_check_cpu(), it is not really necessary to pass it, because
the function can obtain that value via its first argument just fine.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 5 +++--
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 2 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c | 6 ++----
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_loc
void gov_set_update_util(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs,
unsigned int delay_us);
void gov_cancel_work(struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs);
-void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int cpu);
+void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
void od_register_powersave_bias_handler(unsigned int (*f)
(struct cpufreq_policy *, unsigned int, unsigned int),
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -194,9 +194,7 @@ static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct
{
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
- unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info,
- cpu);
+ struct od_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(od_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu);
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
int delay = 0, sample_type = dbs_info->sample_type;
@@ -207,7 +205,7 @@ static unsigned int od_dbs_timer(struct
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->freq_lo,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
} else {
- dbs_check_cpu(policy, cpu);
+ dbs_check_cpu(policy);
if (dbs_info->freq_lo) {
/* Setup timer for SUB_SAMPLE */
dbs_info->sample_type = OD_SUB_SAMPLE;
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
- dbs_check_cpu(policy, policy->cpu);
+ dbs_check_cpu(policy);
return delay_for_sampling_rate(cs_tuners->sampling_rate);
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -31,13 +31,14 @@ static struct attribute_group *get_sysfs
gov->attr_group_gov_pol : gov->attr_group_gov_sys;
}
-void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int cpu)
+void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data;
struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data;
struct od_dbs_tuners *od_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners;
+ int cpu = policy->cpu;
unsigned int sampling_rate;
unsigned int max_load = 0;
unsigned int ignore_nice;
@@ -515,7 +516,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_limits(struc
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
else if (policy->min > policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
- dbs_check_cpu(policy, policy->cpu);
+ dbs_check_cpu(policy);
mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
return 0;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists