linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] trace_irqsoff: remove redundant reset per-CPU buff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJwJo6aNWWFvdj7gqwGV=UYEiic4bufrpO_5RJSHeOYUbtd7HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 5 Feb 2016 18:56:52 +0300
From:	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] trace_irqsoff: remove redundant reset per-CPU buff

2016-02-05 18:04 GMT+03:00 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:

> Also, FYI, even if you do an RFC, include "PATCH" in the brackets as
> well. I usually have "[RFC][PATCH]". Because when I'm looking for
> patches in my inbox, I will filter for PATCH. If a patch is out there
> without that in the subject, it is much more likely to be missed (and
> most likely will).

Will do.
And I added RFC mostly because, I didn't see the reason for reseting
second time, but if it has been (I wasn't sure), I wanted to add a comment,
why.

-- 
Regards,
Safonov Dmitry.