lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201602062222.HJH86328.SMFVtFOJFHQOLO@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 2016 22:22:20 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	mhocko@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	rientjes@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, oleg@...hat.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hughd@...gle.com, andrea@...nel.org,
	riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm, oom: introduce oom reaper

Michal Hocko wrote:
> There is one notable exception to this, though, if the OOM victim was
> in the process of coredumping the result would be incomplete. This is
> considered a reasonable constrain because the overall system health is
> more important than debugability of a particular application.

Is it possible to clarify what "the result would be incomplete" mean?

  (1) The size of coredump file becomes smaller than it should be, and
      data in reaped pages is not included into the file.

  (2) The size of coredump file does not change, and data in reaped pages
      is included into the file as NUL byte.

  (3) The size of coredump file does not change, and data in reaped pages
      is included into the file as-is (i.e. information leak security risk).

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ