linux-kernel - Have some confusion about the pfn

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B5AB4F.3030809@huawei.com>
Date:	Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:14:07 +0800
From:	zhong jiang <zhongjiang@...wei.com>
To:	<mel@....ul.ie>
CC:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Have some confusion about the pfn_valid() ?

Hi

In my opinion, pfn_valid() is meant to be able to tell if a given PFN has valid
section, and That section can contain corresponding mem_map. but, the section can
be has holes, the corresponding mem_map also be allcoated, resulting in treating
the PFN as valid incorrect.

what's problem for the interpretation of the above?