linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from gsm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B74E6E.50804@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 2016 22:02:22 +0800
From:	Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Pan Xinhui <xinhui@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
	mnipxh@....com, yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] tty/n_gsm.c: use gsm->num to remove mux itself from
 gsm_mux[]

hi, Greg
	thanks for your reply.
On 2016/2/7 15:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>> From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>
>> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
>> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
>> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> change from V1:
>> 	lock is also held for the if()
>> ---
>>   drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 13 +++++--------
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Doesn't apply to my tty-next branch of the tty.git tree :(
>

Sorry for not telling you one important information.
This patch is on top of Jiri's patch, "TTY: n_gsm, fix false positive WARN_ON", see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7692181/
Looks like Jiri's patch is still not in your tree.

Hi, Jiri
	Could I make a new patch on top of the mainline's codes first then you prepare your patch on top of mine?
I will appreciate that if you have a better solution :)


thanks
xinhui