[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465939.LaiBibfCQO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 16:23:49 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to
get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the
reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is
actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy
object directy via its argument.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c
@@ -518,20 +518,19 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_limits(struc
{
struct dbs_governor *gov = dbs_governor_of(policy);
struct cpu_dbs_info *cdbs = gov->get_cpu_cdbs(policy->cpu);
+ struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = cdbs->policy_dbs;
/* State should be equivalent to START */
- if (!cdbs->policy_dbs || !cdbs->policy_dbs->policy)
+ if (!policy_dbs || !policy_dbs->policy)
return -EBUSY;
- mutex_lock(&cdbs->policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
- if (policy->max < cdbs->policy_dbs->policy->cur)
- __cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, policy->max,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
- else if (policy->min > cdbs->policy_dbs->policy->cur)
- __cpufreq_driver_target(cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, policy->min,
- CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
+ mutex_lock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
+ if (policy->max < policy->cur)
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ else if (policy->min > policy->cur)
+ __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
dbs_check_cpu(policy);
- mutex_unlock(&cdbs->policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
+ mutex_unlock(&policy_dbs->timer_mutex);
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists