linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/9] Namespaceify more of the tcp sysctl knobs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160207.143654.1285622817453093402.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:36:54 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	kernel@...p.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, fan.du@...el.com,
	kaber@...sh.net, jmorris@...ei.org, alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/9] Namespaceify more of the tcp sysctl knobs 

From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
Date: Wed,  3 Feb 2016 09:46:48 +0200

> This patch series continues making more of the tcp-related
> sysctl knobs be per net-namespace. Most of these apply per
> socket and have global defaults so should be safe and I
> don't expect any breakages. 
> 
> Having those per net-namespace is useful when multiple  
> containers are hosted and it is required to tune the 
> tcp settings for each independently of the host node. 
> 
> I've split the patches to be per-sysctl but after
> the review if the outcome is positive I'm happy
> to either send it in one big blob or just.  

Series applied, thank you.