[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160207220421.GB28175@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 14:04:21 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>,
David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: unisys: use common return path
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 04:22:33PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> The success path and the error path both are first doing
> spin_unlock_irqrestore() before returning. Use that in the common path
> and return the success/error value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> ---
>
> v2: changed label name
>
> It is dependent on the patch series sent by Benjamin (Nov 30th).
Which didn't get applied, so can you resend this after that does get
accepted?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists